![]() ![]() A rich and detailed understanding of systems and processes is made possible. As such, grounded theory generates a high quality of research, revealing multi-layered interpretations of social life. It’s easy to see how it can broaden the reach of an existing theory because it forces the researcher to change the scope of the study to incorporate new information. Grounded theory can take researchers in new and fruitful directions because it involves an interactive process where the overarching goal is to test and refine emerging ideas. This new knowledge would cause you to reconsider your previous understanding. In the end, you may learn that supervisors play a relatively minor role compared to co-workers. The grounded theory process consists of five basic components: theoretical sensitivity, theoretical sampling, coding, theoretical memoing, and sorting. For example, you might compare supervisor/worker relationships across different jobs and types of workplaces.ĭata might emerge that indicate supervisors are supportive when worker absences are brief, but not as supportive when the absences get longer. As I’ve mentioned, grounded theory methodology, as originally developed by Glaser and Strauss and refined by Glaser informed the plan of research for my studies. This is called the constant comparative method, and it is central to grounded theory. Next, you would constantly compare the information you gather with what is already known, and refine your explanations or theories as you go. As well, different types of workplaces, from blue- to white-collar environments, may be included in the sample. Your research plan might involve interviews or focus groups with injured workers who have and have not returned to work, in addition to supervisors and co-workers. ![]() You would start by carefully selecting the people you want to interview (“cases”) and the types of workplaces you want to observe (“settings”), with the aim of getting the richest possible information. You might learn something wholly unexpected. Taking the grounded theory approach, you might enter into the RTW study with similar ideas about the role of supervisor support, but you would remain open to other theories stemming from the data you collect. In other words, it favours an inductive approach, rather than a deductive one. generating theory from data) rather than from the top down (i.e. Grounded theory emphasizes starting from the ground up (i.e. First coined in the 1960s, it was an alternative to the mainstream approach in which information was collected to test a theory. Grounded theory, used in qualitative research, takes a different approach. Based on existing research, you might hypothesize that supervisors facilitate RTW in an important way, and then subsequently design a survey that asks workers about the role of supervisors to test this hypothesis. For example, let’s say you are studying the role of supervisors in the return to work (RTW) of injured workers. Traditionally, scientists collect information to test a potential explanation or assumption. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |